Rotor geometry toolPublished October 17, 2026Updated October 17, 2026Sources checked October 17, 2026Next review April 17, 2027

Axial Halbach Array Magnet Spacing

Calculate circumferential segment pitch, geometric fill, and a first-order thermal gap change. Use the result to check your drawing and prepare machine-specific magnetic and structural validation.

Interactive calculator

Check pitch and edge clearance at three radii

Enter the rotor geometry and a circumferential gap. The tool returns geometry and an explicitly simplified thermal estimate; it does not predict flux, torque, safety, or adhesive performance.

Geometry and thermal inputs

Dimensions use millimetres. The gap input is circumferential edge clearance at the mean radius; it is not the axial rotor-to-stator air gap or an adhesive bondline specification.

Runs locally in your browser; no loading or server request.

The initial CTE values are editable example inputs, not material specifications. Replace them with supplier data for the actual circumferential direction and temperature range.

Total segments

40

2 × pole pairs × segments per pole

Segment angle

9.000°

Equal angular pitch assumption

Mean-radius gap angle

0.220°

Geometric conversion from gap width

Circumferential geometry by radius

Geometric fill is segment arc width divided by local pitch. It is not a magnetic flux or torque estimate.

LocationRadius (mm)Pitch (mm)Gap (mm)Magnet arc (mm)Geometric fill
Inner50.007.8540.1927.66297.6%
Mean65.0010.2100.2509.96097.6%
Outer80.0012.5660.30812.25997.6%

Annular layout, equal-angle segments

Geometry illustration only; colors do not encode magnetization direction.

First-order thermal gap estimate

0.259 mm

Gap change: +9.3 micrometres at +50°C, using mean radius and the entered CTE values.

Model: gap change = (pitch * carrier CTE - magnet arc * magnet CTE) * temperature rise. Assumes bonded segment centres follow carrier pitch and uniform linear expansion. It does not predict stress, deformation, contact, or retention.

Positive modeled clearance is a geometric result only; it does not establish a safe operating margin.

Decision summary

What the spacing result can tell you

The tool answers geometric questions. Use field and structural models for performance and safety decisions.

Pitch changes with radius

For equal-angle segments, the circumferential arc pitch is smaller at the inner radius and larger at the outer radius.

Gap and air gap are different

This calculator uses edge clearance between segments around one rotor. The axial working air gap is a separate machine dimension.

No universal optimum is implied

A gap that fits the drawing may still change field harmonics, losses, retention, and assembly risk. Validate those for the complete machine.

Geometry

Define the gap at a radius and datum

A single millimetre value is not enough unless the drawing says where and how it is measured.

N_seg = 2 x pole pairs x segments per pole
pitch(r) = 2 x pi x r / N_seg
magnet_arc(r) = pitch(r) - gap(r)
geometric_fill = magnet_arc(r) / pitch(r)

Here, pitch is the local arc pitch, magnet_arc is local magnet arc width, gap is circumferential edge clearance, and geometric_fill is their ratio. The calculator displays inner, mean, and outer radii so one value is not mistaken for the whole annulus.

State whether dimensions are measured between coated magnet edges, machined edges, or spacer faces. Keep circumferential clearance separate from the axial rotor-to-stator working gap.

For a drawing-based tolerance stack and inspection plan, see the axial Halbach array assembly tolerance guide.

Pitch, segment width, and clearance
Arc pitch tau(r)Edge gap gMagnet arcradius rDefine the measurement radius and datum on the drawing.

Schematic only; not to scale.

Geometry options

Tile shape changes the gap profile

Choose the measurement plan to match the segment shape. The geometry comparison below is qualitative; tooling and cost depend on the supplier and production route.

Annular wedgesRectangular tilesGap can be defined across the radial spanMeasure local clearance at both ends
Segment geometryGap patternWhat to inspect
Annular wedgeCan maintain a near-constant local arc gap across the radial span when designed for it.Inner and outer edge clearance, angle, and seating.
Rectangular tileGap between parallel edges generally varies with radius on an annular layout.Minimum and maximum clearance around the tile.
Stepped segmentGap profile changes at each step or block boundary.Step alignment, local corner clearance, and transition geometry.
Insulated separatorSeparator thickness becomes part of the stack-up.Installed thickness, compression, and electrical continuity.
Field behavior

Geometry is an input to magnetic analysis

Segmentation and clearances can affect the field distribution, but the calculator does not turn a gap into a flux-loss percentage.

QuestionWhat geometry screening showsWhat needs a machine model
Segment fitLocal pitch, edge clearance, and geometric fill by radius.Manufacturing variation, coating, adhesive, and assembled position.
Air-gap fieldThe segment geometry to use as model input.Magnetization vectors, finite edges, air gap, back iron, saturation, and leakage.
Harmonics and lossesA gap or segmentation boundary exists in the geometry.Harmonic spectrum, slot interaction, conductivity, speed, and thermal boundary conditions.
Torque and retentionNo load or force output.Electromagnetic loading, centrifugal load, adhesive behavior, sleeves, and rotor structure.
Segmented axial-flux Halbach model

Okita and Harada present a 3D analytical model for a defined axial-flux machine and vary geometric parameters. This supports machine-specific analysis, not a universal spacing recommendation.

Read the IEEE paper
Nonlinear field model and validation

Zhang et al. compare a segmented Halbach analytical model with finite-element analysis and prototype measurements. Their work accounts for geometry and iron nonlinearity, variables absent from a gap-only percentage.

Read the IET paper
Interpretation boundary: the geometric fill ratio is not linearly interchangeable with air-gap flux, torque, efficiency, cogging torque, or magnet loss. Use a validated analytical or finite-element model for those outputs.

Need to check load implications after defining the segment geometry? See the axial Halbach force calculation guide, or request a drawing-specific review.

Request a spacing review
Tolerance and temperature

Budget the assembled gap, not only the nominal CAD value

The minimum local clearance is controlled by the full dimensional chain and operating condition.

Identify magnet dimensions and edge condition, carrier pocket position, coating, separator or adhesive, assembly fixture, runout, and thermal movement. Record the measurement datum and inspection method. Avoid combining nominal adhesive thickness with circumferential clearance unless the drawing explicitly defines them as the same dimension.

worst-case minimum gap = nominal gap − tolerance stack

This is a dimensional bookkeeping relation, not a stress or safety-factor equation. Use an agreed worst-case or statistical tolerance method for the project.

Gap stack-up and thermal check
Magnet segmentMagnet segmentnominal gapAdd position, edge, coating, assembly, and thermal contributors
First-order thermal geometry
Compare centre pitch and magnet arc growthmagnet arcmagnet arcgapcarrier pitch expands with carrier CTEFirst-order geometry; restraint and stress are outside this model
Thermal assumptions

Use CTE in the direction that controls the gap

The tool estimates a dimensional change from user-entered circumferential expansion coefficients.

A bonded segment centre may follow the carrier pitch while the magnet arc expands at its own rate. The tool compares those changes at the mean radius. Its result is sensitive to the entered values and assumes uniform linear expansion.

  • Use the circumferential-axis CTE for the magnet and carrier.
  • Use the project temperature rise from the reference assembly condition.
  • Check restraint, adhesive compliance, gradients, and contact separately in structural analysis.
Adhesive evidence

A test bondline is not a rotor spacing recommendation

Manufacturer test data can describe adhesive behavior under stated coupon conditions. It does not establish a universal gap for an axial Halbach rotor.

What the cited product data says

The 3M DP460 technical sheet reports selected overlap-shear test data with a 0.005–0.008 in (about 0.13–0.20 mm) coupon bondline. It states that its performance data are typical and should not be used for specification.

The coupon result is evidence for that adhesive test setup. It is not a target circumferential gap, not a rotor design allowable, and not evidence that the same performance will occur on coated magnet edges or under centrifugal loading.

Open the 3M technical data sheet
Keep these dimensions distinct

Circumferential clearance is measured between adjacent segments around the rotor. Adhesive bondline thickness is the thickness of a particular bonded interface. Depending on the assembly, those dimensions may be related, but they are not interchangeable by default.

Select adhesives from current manufacturer data for the actual substrates, surface preparation, cure, temperature, fatigue, and environment. Then validate the joint on representative parts.

Open Henkel LOCTITE EA 9466 product information
Validation workflow

Turn the geometry screen into an engineering check

Use a traceable sequence so that the chosen gap is linked to the drawing, model, assembly process, and inspection result.

1

Define drawing datums and gap locations

2

Check tolerance and thermal stack

3

Model magnetic and structural behavior

4

Inspect and test a representative build

Define

Set datums, local measurement radii, edge condition, tolerances, coating, and the meaning of nominal gap.

Model

Use actual segment magnetization, machine air gap, back iron, stator slots, material curves, speed, and temperature.

Verify

Compare analysis with dimensional inspection and a representative rotor test; update the model when evidence differs.

Example decisions

Three cases where one nominal number is not enough

These are process examples, not performance claims or recommended dimensions.

Wedge segments

Assumption: The drawing defines radial wedge faces and a local circumferential clearance.

Check: Check clearance at the inner and outer radii, then include segment position and edge tolerances.

Next: Use the resulting sector geometry in the field model.

Rectangular tiles

Assumption: Tile edges are parallel while the rotor layout follows an annulus.

Check: Measure the local edge gap along the radial span; a mean-radius value can hide a tight or wide end.

Next: Represent the actual tile outline in the magnetic and structural models.

Insulating separators

Assumption: A separator is added to break or control an electrical path.

Check: Include its installed thickness and compression in the tolerance stack.

Next: Check transient loss and temperature; electrical isolation alone does not quantify the benefit.

Sources and limits

Evidence used on this page

The sources support modeling and interpretation limits. They do not provide a universal production spacing range.

3-D Analytical Model of Axial-Flux Permanent Magnet Machine With Segmented Multipole-Halbach Array

T. Okita and H. Harada · IEEE Access, Volume 11, pages 2078–2091 · 2023

Presents a 3D analytical model for a particular segmented axial-flux Halbach machine and evaluates geometry-dependent electromagnetic behavior.

View source
Analytical field model of segmented Halbach array permanent magnet machines considering iron nonlinearity

H. Zhang et al. · IET Electric Power Applications, Volume 15, pages 717–727 · 2021

Compares a nonlinear analytical model with finite-element results and prototype measurements; it demonstrates why magnetic predictions depend on the complete machine model.

View source
3M Scotch-Weld Epoxy Adhesive DP460 Technical Data Sheet

3M · 3M product technical data sheet · n.d.

Reports test-coupon data using a 0.005–0.008 in bondline and cautions that the listed values are typical and not for specification purposes.

View source
LOCTITE EA 9466 product information

Henkel · Henkel product page · n.d.

Describes a toughened structural epoxy with peel and shear strength; the product page does not prescribe a universal circumferential magnet gap.

View source

Sources checked October 17, 2026. Numeric product data and design rules should be checked against current supplier documentation and the actual assembly before release.

FAQ

Axial Halbach array magnet spacing questions

Answers focus on what this geometric tool can establish and what requires project-specific validation.

Geometry and terminology

What does magnet spacing mean on this page?

It means the circumferential edge clearance between neighboring magnet segments at a stated radius. It is not the axial rotor-to-stator air gap.

Is circumferential spacing the same as adhesive bondline thickness?

No. A gap may contain adhesive, insulation, coating, or open clearance, but the dimensions and loading of that joint need separate definition. The calculator does not specify an adhesive bondline.

How is circumferential segment pitch calculated?

For N equally spaced segments at radius r, the arc pitch is 2*pi*r/N. The calculator uses N = 2 times pole pairs times segments per pole.

Why are inner and outer radius results different?

Circumference changes with radius. Under the equal-angle assumption in this tool, both local pitch and gap scale with radius. A rectangular tile can have a different local gap profile, so inspect its actual edges.

Does the tool calculate wedge magnet geometry?

It shows equal-angle annular segments and evaluates a local arc gap at inner, mean, and outer radii. It does not generate a manufacturing drawing or model a rectangular tile whose edge gap varies with radius.

What does geometric fill factor mean here?

It is the segment arc width divided by the local arc pitch. It is a geometric ratio only, not a magnetic flux, torque, efficiency, or loss estimate.

Thermal and material assumptions

How does the thermal estimate work?

It estimates gap change from the difference between carrier pitch expansion and magnet arc expansion using the entered circumferential CTE values and temperature rise.

Are the default CTE values material specifications?

No. They are editable example values to demonstrate the calculation. Replace them with supplier data for the actual material grade, direction, and temperature range.

Does the thermal result predict stress or magnet fracture?

No. It is a first-order dimensional estimate. Stress, contact, adhesive response, rotor deformation, and retention require the actual geometry, loads, boundary conditions, and material data.

Does the tool set a safe or recommended gap?

No. There is no universal spacing established by this calculator. The required value depends on segment geometry, tolerances, assembly method, thermal range, retention, and machine performance targets.

Can I use one gap value for rectangular tiles?

Only if that matches the drawing definition and measurement method. For constant-width rectangular tiles on an annulus, circumferential clearance generally changes with radius; inspect the minimum and maximum edge gaps directly.

What if the calculated hot gap is zero or negative?

Treat it as a boundary warning from the simplified model. Check CTE directions, temperature range, segment restraint, tolerances, and actual contact conditions in a geometry-specific analysis.

Magnetic performance and validation

Can the tool estimate flux loss from the gap?

No. Flux depends on magnetization, segment dimensions, pole pattern, air gap, back iron, stator geometry, saturation, and leakage. Use a validated analytical model or finite-element analysis for the machine.

Will a wider gap always reduce torque by a fixed percentage?

The tool does not make that prediction. The relationship is machine-specific, and a geometric fill ratio cannot be converted directly into torque or efficiency.

How should I validate a spacing design?

Check drawing tolerances at inner, mean, and outer radii, then evaluate magnetic performance and structural retention using the full assembly model. Confirm critical dimensions and operating behavior on a representative build.

What measurements should an assembly drawing define?

Define the radius and datum for each gap, segment position and orientation, edge condition, allowable variation, temperature condition, and inspection method. State separately whether any clearance is filled by adhesive or insulation.

Does adding an insulating spacer guarantee lower rotor losses?

No. Electrical isolation can alter current paths, but loss depends on the time-varying field, conductivity, segmentation, and machine operation. Confirm with transient electromagnetic analysis and measurement.

What does the 3M DP460 bondline data tell me?

The cited 3M sheet reports typical test-coupon properties for a stated bondline and test setup, and says the values are not for specification. It does not define an axial Halbach rotor gap or a production adhesive target.

Engineering review

Validate the spacing in your rotor assembly

Share the segment drawing, pole and segment count, magnet grade, carrier material, operating range, speed, and inspection plan for a geometry-specific review.

Engineering RFQ Inbox

[email protected]

Include the rotor drawing, segment geometry, material data, temperature range, speed, and target inspection method.

Direct Engineer Chat

WhatsApp Engineering Support

Use for drawing, specification, and RFQ clarification.